An Unbiased View of Fox Business/technology
For example, science may study the circulation of electrons in electrical conductors by using already-existing tools and understanding. This new-found understanding may then be used by engineers to produce new tools and devices such as semiconductors, computers, and other kinds of innovative innovation. In this sense, researchers and engineers might both be considered technologists ; the three fields are often thought about as one for the functions of research study and recommendation. The exact relations in between science and innovation, in particular, have actually been disputed by scientists, historians, and policymakers in the late 20th century, in part because the dispute can notify the financing of standard and used science.
An articulation of this viewpoint could be found clearly in Vannevar Bush's writing on postwar science policy, Science The Limitless Frontier: "New items, new industries, and more jobs need continuous additions to knowledge of the laws of nature ... This vital new understanding can be obtained just through basic clinical research." In the late-1960s, however, this view came under direct attack, leading towards efforts to money science for specific jobs (efforts withstood by the scientific community). The concern remains contentious, though most analysts resist the design that technology is an outcome of clinical research.